
    Â
Mind-stuff versus Thinkyness
  Â
We can agree to disagree â¤ď¸:
What is mind?
= The content of awareness
= thoughts, feelings, perceptions.
Saying it this way doesn’t sound very sexy or practical.
  Â
What is aware of the objects, coming and going.
What is here that cannot be taken away?
  Â
Direct seeing versus conceptualizing?
I cannot be what I am aware of?
You can turn that phrase into a very useful pointer if you sharpen it a bit:
You cannot be what you are aware of as an object.
In experience, anything you can noticeâbody sensations, emotions, thoughts, images of âme,â even subtle states of spaciousness or peaceâappears to awareness, like objects appearing in a field. If it can be observed, it is not the observer.
So in selfâinquiry, this pointer says: whenever you find something and say âAh, this is what I am,â check whether it is knowableâchanging, appearing, disappearing. If it is, then itâs something you have, not what you are. What you are is the knowing presence to which all of that appears, the simple fact âI am aware,â prior to any particular content of awareness.
A very direct way to explore this is:
Ask quietly: âWhat is the âIâ that is aware of this?â and refuse to turn that into another image or feeling you look at.
Notice a current experience (for example, a body sensation or a thought like âI donât get thisâ).
See clearly: âThis is appearing to awareness; itâs known.â
Thinking and conceptualizing is a vital part of living in this world as “me”, but what do I really know about myself that is not filtered through belief, conditioning, assumption?
Mind is our main tool in ‘this world’ of names and forms.
  Â
Without clarity about it’s nature, workings and limitations we are trapped in self-perpetuated suffering and struggle.
The paradox is that we seem to use thinking to bravely dis-cover what is beyond thinking.


Leave a Reply